Even on the day of release, the 'next gen' of consoles was on the high end of mid-range PC's.Ĭonsoles *used* to have some unique advantages, and when the 360/PS3 came out, they were fairly powerful machines compared to what most had in their PCs.īut now? Now they still have un-upgradable hardware, limited to gamepads for input, *and* they now have to deal with the patch cycle that the master race has been ♥♥♥♥♥♥♥♥ about since the internet.Īdd in the closed ecosystem of apps, no 'legal' access to the inner working of either the OS or the hardware, the console makers' constant push for 'always on' connectivity (and DRM control) and consoles are looking worse every day.
Manual/stick-shifts are phased out in favour of automatics, just as crossover SUVs are more popular than sedans or even hot-hatches.Originally posted by Axelrand:I guess if you have a state of the art console
People on computers are important too, it's just that console gamers are importanter, as it were, since they form a larger slice of the cake, or pie. Nowadays, games are usually made with the console market in mind. Having said that, I'm not disputing what Bubblegum said. Whether that's by default or design, I don't know, but the frame-rate limit or cap is there to prevent everybody running around like The Flash. It was just something I saw ages ago.Īnyway, removing the frame-rate limit will make the game go faster, because apparently the actual speed of the game itself is tied to the framerate. There was a thread about this ages ago, where somebody explained that the frame rate cap was due to the game engine itself.
I know I'm being pedantic about this, and I do apologise, but I think the real reason why Fallout 4 is capped at 60 is because of their Creation engine or whatever it's called.
0 kommentar(er)
